Obama Analysis

Since Democrats are going off the deep end lately about how president Trump is doing such a bad job, I think it’s time to set the record straight about thier wonder president and thier stances on issues.

1. You said nothing when Obama used drone strikes to execute people abroad.

2. You said nothing about Russia for 50 years until Trump was inaugurated.

3. You said nothing about Hillary’s campaign manager’s brother being paid $175,000 to lift U.S. sanctions on Russia.

4. You said nothing when Obama engaged in military interventionism in Libya without Congressional approval.

5. You said nothing Obama greatly expanded presidential power through the use of Executive Orders.

6. You said nothing when Obama filled his White House with lobbyists after he said he wouldn’t.

7. You said nothing when Obama gave 47 of his fundraisers Administration jobs.

8. You said nothing about the murders and rapes at the hands of illegal immigrants.

9. You said nothing when Hillary’s net worth rose over $100 million as Secretary of State, in part, because her husband took money from foreign governments.

10. You said nothing after Obama’s net worth rose over $10 million as President.

11. You said nothing when Obama’s Justice Dept. wiretapped/surveilled reporters such as James Rosen and the AP.

12. You said nothing when Obama restricted immigration 6 times with Executive Orders.

13. You said nothing when Obama set a record for deportations.

14. You said nothing when Bill Clinton met Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac during the Clinton investigation.

15. You said nothing when Hillary was fed debate questions.

16. You said nothing when Obama and Hillary lied about a video and Benghazi.

17. You said nothing when Obama’s IRS abused the rights of taxpayers.

18. You said nothing when Obama’s White House held meetings with lobbyists in coffee shops near White House to avoid disclosure requirements.

19. You said nothing when Eric Holder sold the guns you hate to criminals and some were used to kill Americans.

20. You said nothing when the Clinton’s took White House property.

21. You said nothing when Hillary laughed off defending a child-rapist.

22. You said nothing when Hillary lied about her private use of a private email server as Secretary of State.

23. You said nothing when Janet Reno, under Bill Clinton, used a tank to kill the Branch Dividians.

24. You said nothing when, on May 13, 1985, a bomb was dropped on a row house in Philadelphia to uproot the black liberation group known as Move, resulting in a fire that eventually burned down 61 houses, killed 11 people (including five children) and injured dozens.

25. You said nothing as Elian Gonzales was forcibly deported using guns.

26. You said nothing when George Soros paid protesters to burn parts of Ferguson.

27. You said nothing about states’ rights until Trump’s Executive orders on immigration.

28. You said nothing about Obama’s smoking.

29. You said nothing about the record numbers of people on government assistance.

30. You said nothing about the number of part time and low paying jobs under the Obama recovery.

31. You said nothing when Obama had SWAT teams raid a Gibson guitar factory and seize property, on the purported basis that Gibson had broken India’s environmental laws—but no charges were filed.

32. You said nothing when Obama claimed that the Fort Hood shooting was “workplace violence” rather than terrorism.

33. You said nothing about when Obama ended some terror asylum restrictions, by allowing asylum for people who provided only “insignificant” or “limited” material support of terrorists.

34. You said nothing when the national debt doubled under Obama.

35. You said nothing when 9 times the Supreme Court unanimously overturned Obama’s expansive use of Executive Power.

36. You said nothing when Obama dismissed charges filed by Bush Administration against New Black Panther Party members who were videotaped intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling station during the 2008 election.

37. You said nothing when Obama released Guantanamo detainees and went back to killing Americans.

38. You said nothing when Obama unilaterally changed Congressional law by Executive Order.

39. You said nothing when Obama fired an inspector general after investigating an $850,000 AmeriCorps grant received by a nonprofit run by former NBA star and Obama supporter Kevin Johnson.

40. You said nothing about the 36 Obama’s executive office staffers that owed $833,970 in back taxes

41. You said nothing when Obama Killed four Americans overseas in counter-terrorism operations without a judicial process.

So if you are voicing your objections about three months of Trump, I’m sorry… we can’t hear you because you said NOTHING before!!

Credit for this list goes to Tom Wilsdon


Liberals & Hitler

Many of the liberal ideologies that many of the Democrats and other Liberals have been preaching for years just doesn’t work. It’s immoral even by their standards. The amusing thing is that they don’t recognize it for they feel that they are righteous and right because they’re better than conservatives.

Personally, I just don’t see the ideologies presented by the Democrats / Liberals / Progressives ever coming true. Primarily because humanity is greedy. No one will work for free… and the reasoning of ‘working for the greater good’ is a pipe dream at best.


Being a progressive / liberal doesn’t mean that you’re better than anyone else. All it proves is that you’re trying to set mankind back to the time of WWII. The NAZI party was a worker’s union before Hitler took over. And when Hitler was in power, he had many of the things that the liberals / progressives want today. In the list below, I will list all the things that Hitler had that they want.

  • Free Healthcare
  • Free Education
  • Free Housing
  • Redistribution of wealth
  • Used violence in attempt to get what they wanted
  • Made extensive use of smear propaganda
  • If you’re not apart of their beliefs / party go take a flying leap, they’re better than you.

More over, the name NAZI itself explains what their party was. Nazi is a abbreviation for The National Socialist German Workers Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) better known as the NSDAP or the Nazi Party.

As poet George Santayana once said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” and it’s very apparent that the liberals have forgotten.

If you don’t believe what’s in this post, perform a web search on ‘NAZI Party’. You’ll see lots of different independent, and many reputable sites saying the same thing. Socialism is socialism no matter if its Adolf Hitler implementing it or the Democrats / Liberals / Progressives.

Dear Democrats

Dear Democrats,

The country does not care that it does not have a Democrat President. The recounts, protests, and the attempt to ceede from the United States will not work. Even with Bernie Sanders as your nominee, he still would’ve lost to Donald Trump. Even people of your own party didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton because they didn’t like her.

You call canservitives racist when you yourselves want to punish the white man. I don’t need to remind you that it was the Republicans that wanted to free slaves (it didn’t have any Democrat support), it was Republicans that wanted to give women the right to vote (it had little to no Democrat support), it was the Republicans that wanted to give blacks the right to vote. No, the conservatives wanted and still want equal rights for everyone.

Then there’s socialism. Need I show you the numbers? You should already know them. In Detroit, California, and New York, just a few of the Democrat run areas, crime and poverty is the highest. In fact in Hawaii, homelessness, and unemployment has gone up, not down under the governship of Democrat Governor David Ige and the Democrat run State Legislature. There was even a mass departure from California because of the the California government.

Now, let’s speak about war since you call Republicans Warmongers. If the Democrats look at history, you can see whom the truely violent political party really is.  During the 20th century, it was a Democrat that took America in mosy of the major wars and conflicts.

  • The Civil War (Democrats ceeded from the union to create the Confederate States of America)
  • World War I (President Woodrow Wilson, Democrat)
  • Vietnam Conflict (President John F. Kennedy, Democrat)
  • Korean War (President Harry S. Truman, Democrat)

    Before calling anyone a warmonger, I would strongly suggest that you look in the mirror first. Our great country will be facing many dangers and evils from within and externally in the upcoming years. We need to solidify our stances and our morale. The election is over, we need unity.

    Speaking of unity, lets talk about that now. As I said above, we need unity. Not protests, riots, or any politician fanning the flames with making speeches about someone whom is racist being put into Trump’s cabinet. The propaganda that Hillary, the Democrats, and the main stream media has spread is helping no one, and no Democrat except for one has come forward to make a speech about unity except for Tulsi Gabbard. President Obama and Hillary Clinton only made half hearted attepmts to call for unity, and they only did so once. So it seems like to me that the Democrats and Liberals don’t want unity. Why I even wrote an e-mail to the Democrat Party of Hawaii asking for them to call for unity, and they never even answered.

    Next, let’s speak about racism and sexism, shall we? Since you Democrats love to call us racist and sexist, let’s look at the Democrat Party history. You’ll find that after you finish reading my post that it’s the Democrats that are racist, not the Republicans.

    • Republicans wanted freedom for the slaves, Democrats did not (Hence the Civil War).
    • Republicans wanted the blacks to have voting rights (it had little to no support from the Democrats).
    • Republicans wanted women to have the right to vote (this also had little to no support from the Democrats).

    Before you call anyone racist or sexist, I would look in the mirror, Democrats and Liberals.

    Now, the whole devil thing. I for one don’t appreciate being called a devil for I care about others, and feel that god looks out for everyone not just Christians. Yes everyone does have the right to believe what they wish. If they believe that there’s no god, more power to them. As long as you don’t press your beliefs on others (something which liberals and Democrats do all the time), I feel that you’re free to believe whatever you wish to. Republicans are far from evil.

    With all of that said, before you judge someone because they’re conservative or Republican, look to yourself and your political party. I’m sure that you’ll find that you’re what you accuse the Conservatives and Republicans of.



    PSA: Leggings are NOT pants


    I’m a guy, not that I don’t like seeing stuff like this on the right woman, but there’s a fine line that I don’t think that anyone should cross.  I can understand if the gal is trim and fit, and the leggings weren’t so worn that you can see right through it, but many times when you see a lady in leggings, it’s not a pretty sight, and the person wearing the leggings seems to be oblivious to the world that what they’re wearing is so wrong.  For many men, a trip to the mall is like going on a safari: they get to see camel toe in leopard print.

    When you see things like what’s pictured above, it’s tasteless and rather disgusting.  A woman shouldn’t wear clothing like that if they don’t have the body for it.  I understand freedom of expression (and if looking at it from this prospective the freedom should have a gag order).  Yeah, yeah…  I can hear many people saying now: “Well then, don’t look”.  My take on that is, it’s hard to miss if they’re bending over in front of you and shoving their butt in your face.

    As I’ve said often in the past, there’s just somethings that a man just shouldn’t see.  And this is one of them.  So please, please, please remember that leggings are NOT pants!

    Thank you.



    Yay Superbowl 50!


    NFL Super Bowl 50

    So it’s the Broncos and the Panthers at Super Bowl 50.  I say it’ll be the Broncos by 3 points.  The Panthers present a might obstacle, but Peyton Manning does have more overall experience even though he doesn’t perform like he used to .  The biggest problem with the Panthers right now which may be a costly one at that is that they’re not just confident, they’re cocky.  I remember the last team that went undefeated during the regular season and the playoffs, and extremely cocky about it too.  It was the New England Patriots.  They underestimated the opposition.  The Panthers are likely to do the same, it’s human nature.

    Personally, I’d like to see the Broncos win because I feel that Peyton Manning deserves another ring before he retires. 🙂  Of course, I know I could be wrong about all of this, and the Panthers could take home the Lombardi Trophy.  But, I’m fairly confident about my prediction.  If the Broncos can take on the Brady Bunch and win, they can do the same thing with the Panthers.  Brady and Bilicheat couldn’t figure out Manning and the Boncos, and I highly doubt that the Cam Newton and the Panthers will be able to.

    Since we’re on the subject of predictions, I think I’ll predict the LA Rams and the LA Chragers 2016 season as well.  I say that the Rams won’t do any better than they did in St. Louis, and that financially, they won’t do any better either.  When it comes to money, it all relys on the success of the team and the loyalty of its fans.  Seeing that this is the second move that the Rams has made, and the second time that the Ram’s owner turn his back on his loyal fans, things may even be worse.  As for the Chargers, I predict that they won’t do any better either next season.  The chargers turned thier backs on thier fans as well.

    I feel that the Chargers could’ve found a way to stay in San Diego if they worked hard enough at it.  The only move that I could’ve understood is the Raiders.  They’re in bad need of a new stadium.  What took place in that owners meeting was just bad, just because they don’t like one of the other owners, they shouldn’t punish the team or the fans that go to see the team play.  While old, the stadiums that the Chargers and the Rams were in were just fine.  While I don’t like the current owner of the Raiders and feel that he should sell the team who does know what they’re doing, I do know that the team needs a new stadium.

    Of course, the true and die hard fans would follow thier team and still be fans no matter where they’re headquartered (I would follow the KC Chiefs no matter where they moved to), but they should keep ALL the fans in mind, even the fair weathered ones.  Here in America, we all love football. 🙂

    Thank You Mr. President!


    What IS that smell?

    According to KHON2 News here in Hawaii, Obama has cost local taxpayers $341,217 in HPD (Honolulu Police Department) in over time to help the secret service keep President Obama safe.  In essance the residents of Honolulu County  paid not only via thier federal tax dollars but also via thier City taxes.  This was an extravagant waste of money by the first family.  As far as I can recollect, he’s “vacationed” in Hawaii on taxpayer dollars 3 seperate times so far while in office.  While I can understand a vaction (everyone needs one), he should’ve selected a much less expensive location to take vacation in, or have a shortened stay.

    In 2014, the president cost the Tax Payers in Honolulu $277,585, and in 2013 it cost $293,732.  Being that the president is so “for the people” like the democratic party supposedly is, you would think that they would’ve granted remimbursement to the Honolulu tax payers…  But the democrats did no such thing and turned thier backs on the people in Honolulu like they did to a loyal (she was a Democrat until no support from her chosen political party came) voter in kentucky when she was jailed for trying to uphold her religous values (which is a right granted by the Constitution of the United States) and do her job at the same time.  Needless to say, she became a republican after that incident.

    In a debate that I watched the other day, the democrats want to give away free healthcare, free higher education to everyone.  While the thought behind of it is a good one, where is all the money for that coming from?  Taxes will go up and new taxes will be created to fund all of these things that they want to do.  And to top it all off, they say how Republicans don’t care about the people serving in the military when they want to do nothing for our veterans.  They mentioned nothing about reforming the healthcare for our veterans or creating more programs to help them.  Obama does nothing to stop the riots from happening in Musurri, and cares more about muslims than he cares about christians.  He discriminates against christians, but sticks up for muslims.

    Just the other day, I saw an article that the Democrat state legistature wanted to kill domestic stray cats to save an endangered goose.  While yes, I understand trying to protect and preserve one of the few native birds left in Hawaii is very important (and I back the notion), and I believe that they should be saved, they shouldn’t kill cats.  To coin a phrase many democrats echo “Everyone has the right to live”.  The liberal democrats will do anything that’s easiest for them while disguising it’s actions as humanitarian when they’re doing no such thing.  Speaking of humanitarian actions…

    The homeless problem…  Everyone’s screaming about it.  Well, most liberals here are.  Of course, the Democrats in charge here are always saying that they’re going to do something about it, but haven’t done a blimey thing.  Oh, they constructed “affordable housing”.  There’s two big problems with this idea that the Democrats have been pushing for years.  The first problem is: “affordable” isn’t really affordable.  Truely affordable housing is where a family making $25,000 or less a year can afford to make payments on.  Not an apartment/condo/house that costs over $250,000.  The second even more big of a problem is that most of them either don’t want to pay rent or don’t want to live in a house.  They interviewed some on the local news, and some said just that.  The canidate that did have an actual plan for the homeless was republican and not elected into office.

    Democrats love to waste money and drag thier feet when doing things that they pushed for.  The rail project here in Hawaii, another Democrat endorsed project is far behind schedule and way over budget in the millions of dollars.  They gave excuses at first why they didn’t start on the rail when they got funds from the federal government.  They finally got off thier butts and got into gear when the federal government threatened to ask for the money back.  To be honest, the rail will only benifit one relatively small group of people living on the west side of the island.  And that fixed rail and the rail stations will make the island ugly.  As they put up the columns now you can see just that.  The very people that voted in favor of the rail now complains about all the traffic and the inconvience of the detours that the rail construction is causing…  *facepalm*  And to top it all off, the people the rail is primarily for won’t even ride the rail.  Because everyone knows the old addage: “Mass transit is a wonderful thing.  Everyone should ride it but me”.

    You know, the funny thing is that Governor Ige said after getting elected: “The Democrat party is the future of America”.  Just from looking at all the things that they’ve done in Hawaii, and all the things that they did that was half-assed that ultimately backfired, you can see that this is actually wrong.  After being in charge for decades in Hawaii, the poor is still poor, and the rich are still rich.  Go figure.

    Now Here’s A Thought

    Image courtesy of stockimages at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    Image courtesy of stockimages at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    Have you ever had an inconsiderate person bump or slam into you because they were so busy with their smart phone to notice their surroundings?  Maybe even walking too slow holding everyone up?  Well, Chongqing in South West China has come up with an ingenious idea to circumvent this problem.

    They’ve separated the sidewalk into two separate lanes.  Both are clearly separated and marked by white paint on the ground, both in English and in Chinese.  The lane closest to the traffic is for the cellphone users, the one on the right is for those not using cellphones.  If you look at the picture in the article, this is how it’s laid out.  You would think that the lane for cellphone users would be on the inside for safety reasons, but no, it’s close to traffic.  Maybe it’s an incentive to stay off your mobile device while walking.

    While similar laws were spoken about here in Hawaii about outlawing the use of mobile devices while crossing the street, while for safety reasons, it was met with out lash.  When mobile devices use was outlawed here several years ago (except for use with a headset device), there were studies that were already done that show it makes no difference in the amount of accidents if one uses a headset or not.

    According to articles that I’ve read, most people just can’t multi-task.  In fact experts say that about 98% of people can’t multi-task, and many of us overrate our tasking abilities.  I’ve found three different sources that agree with this theory.  I tend to lean this way too.  So I feel than unless you’re a passenger in a vehicle, it’s not good to be using any type of device while commuting (walking, driving, etc).  Not only is it considerate to those around you, it’s safer for you.

    Anyhow, while I support lanes like this,  unfortunately another out lash will happen because people want to be bliss in their small world of selfishness even though it may endanger themselves or others.  I personally don’t use my smartphone while commuting (driving or walking) due to the safety factor.  Nothing is that important where you should risk your life and the life of others to pay attention to your device over concentrating on driving or paying attention to where you’re going.

    If you’re interested, I have the links to the sites where I read the information that I’ve stated above.  Thanks for reading my rant.

    The Rice Issue

    I ask myself, what the hell is going on? Why didn’t the NFL put more pressure on the Baltimore Ravens to keep asking for the security tape from the casino and the authorities? Even the owner himself in a letter to share holders admitted to

    Stopping the investigation and pursuing the security footage.

    Why? Well, the only reason that I can think of is that the Ravens didn’t want to lose one of its best players. While I agree that he should be given the benefit of the doubt, stopping all investigation until the authorities render a verdict is unheard of. That’s the reputation of the Ravens and the NFL on the line.

    For heaven’s sake there’s no excuse for hitting the one that you love (or anyone for that matter). Its one thing to argue, but to behave like a Neanderthal and resort to violence is horrifying and inexcusable especially someone in the public eye and a representative of a professional organization.

    Personally, I’m happy that the Ravens did fire him (he deserved what he got, IMO). I suppose that better to take action late than not to take action at all. With all the financial resources that the NFL has, I don’t understand why they didn’t pursue the security footage more vigorously.

    The NFL commissioner did release a statement that he didn’t see the footage right away (OK, we all know that already) therefore, action was taken late. Uhm… Just like a politician. Dodge the question (SMH). As I already said, I suppose late action is better than no action.

    In the ending, no matter if the NFL and the Ravens took action late or not, the important thing is that they did take action in my opinion. I for one don’t believe in violence, I feel that everything can be talked out if both sides are intelligent, patient, and want to resolve the conflict without violence.

    If you’d like to see the letter from the Ravens owner, the link is here. Thanks for reading.

    Serial Bank Robbers & Their Families


    A couple of days ago, the Honolulu Police Department (HPD), apprehended the suspects they say are responsible for the string of bank robberies that took place on the island. While that’s good news in my opinion, the more disturbing news is that thier family members are being are in the process of being evicted from state subsidized housing in Halawa. Is punishing their families for what they did is correct? Only one of the suspects were listed on the lease, and while I can understand he’s living there and suspected of crimes, he hasn’t been convicted yet.

    So, that leaves the question of the ethics of the evictions. I do understand the housing is tax payer funded and there is strict rules, why punish the entire family for what one person has done? As I write this, there are 3 families that have their futures up in the air and uncertain. The other 2 suspects were being hid there by their families, while I can understand that’s illegal, and stupid, the ethics of eviction is still in question.

    After giving this a lot of thought, I take the side of the authorities. I feel that the families knew that the suspects were wanted for commuting crimes, but allowed them to stay with them. But the one that lived there? I have the feeling that his father knew. Should they be evicted? Yes.

    Many will feel differently for many different reasons, but if you think about it logically, most parents will protect thier child no matter how old they are, or what they did. Its maternal instinct, and very common. That and when one is young, scared, and don’t know what to do, where do they run? They run to thier parents/families for help. So, did they know yes, more than likely. And even if they didn’t, they were allowed to stay there. If the authorities allow them to stay, in the future, this will happen again. And we’d be funding public housing for criminals, funding the prison system is enough. The law abiding citizens shouldn’t be forced to help house criminals on the outside.

    In any case, those are my thoughts on this subject. Thanks for reading. 🙂

    What the???


    How barbaric and arcane.  How could anyone eat a cat?  According to an article that I just read from the AFT on Yahoo! news, many people in Vietnam still do.  Perhaps before the industrial age, that would have been OK, but now in the 21st century?  Vietnam is one country that has many people there that enjoys eating cats.


    In Hanoi they have a ban on eating cats so it would help to with the city’s rodent problem.  But, since there’s such a high demand for feline meat, thieves even steal pets.  Just as a warning to those whom are going to Vietnam make sure to make sure what the meat is before consuming it (ugh, gross).  Don’t get me wrong, I won’t eat any pet. I find it quite distasteful.  Anyhow, it’s rare to see any cats roaming the streets in Hanoi because of this barbaric custom.  According to the article, pet owners keep their pet cats behind locked doors tethered to a leash for fear that someone may steal their beloved kitty.

    I have nothing against the Vietnamese, I just feel that it’s disgusting to eat a cute fuzzy cat that in many places including America is considered to be apart of the family and to be a cute pet.  The only time that I would consider eating a pet is during an Apocalypse where food is hard to come by or there just isn’t any.  Even then I wouldn’t be able to do kill a cat and eat it.  Ugh, no cat bits for me, thank you.

    If you’re interested in the article that I mentioned in this post, you can read it here:


    Ugh, how distasteful.  I think I just killed my own appetite.  Anyhow, this is my thought of the day today.  I felt that this needed to be brought to light seeing how distasteful this really is.  I hope that I haven’t killed your appetite as well.  Thanks for reading. 🙂