The recent events in Vegas…

Democrats are distasteful, evil, hypocrites… Now they’re using the deaths of innocent people to push their agendas in congress. That’s just evil. Instead of taking time out and going on national TV and asking for the country, and their fellow Democrats to stop the hate, and all the protests; they chose to continue to push their identity politics and gun control (Reference Democrat Senator Schatz asking for more gun control the very day after the Vegas shooting on the Senate floor). That’s just plain disgusting, but it’s a typical Democrat move, and it’s not surprising. They focus on the hate, not the healing. That’s the Democrats and the left for you.

Anyhow, this is my take on what I’ve been able to gather from sources off of the internet. I do not necessarily trust what I get from the media. I think that there’s a cover up going on, and I think it’s going on above the media’s head in this case… I think this may be going on at the federal government level…Because the LEOs seem to be involved, and I wouldn’t doubt if some Democrat had something to do with the main reason for the cover up.

I do not believe what the media is saying about the there being no motive. There was a motive. The guy was leftist more than likely, brainwashed by the liberal left, and wanted to gun down conservatives. This shooting doesn’t match ISIS’ MO. What better place to do it at than a country music concert? Why? Country music is usually about everything that the left hates. The flag, Americana, traditional families, love for the country, fighting for the country, being a patriot, etc. All the things that the left hate and are protesting right now.

As far as him travelling? Doubtful, I think that the evidence may have been planted… Come on here, anyone with any common sense has got to know that when someone starts shooting like that, and people are dead, it’s a one way ticket to the morgue. The LEOs are going to shoot you on sight, they’re not going to yell, “Freeze, drop the weapon”. They’re going to shoot your ugly ass, and get rid of the damned threat.

There was more than one person shooting as well. I’ve seen more than one video of the shooting, and can hear shots from two different distances. One seems farther than the other, and both are automatic gunfire, not handguns either.

What was said about the 36th floor was bullshit. From eyewitness and video on YouTube, it’s plain to see that it happened on about the 10th floor or so of the hotel in question. So there is some deliberate misinformation being fed to the public about what actually happened that night. While I’m sure that there is probably a good and rational explanation for it, they’re not telling us for a good reason. Moreover, when all of this took place most people didn’t even seem alarmed by it in the lobby of the Mandalay Bay. They may have all thought it was part of the show? But security was very lax, too laxed for this event.

In my opinion, I feel that security fucked up in allowing that guy into the event with all those weapons. How could anyone miss all those weapons that he was carrying? Then when he started shooting, no one took action right away. Why was there no off duty LEOs on duty at the event? I thought they usually hired off duty LEOs at the events to assist with security, and they’re usually armed. Also with all those people on site, why didn’t anyone run and call the LEOs? Rhetorical question.

Now on to the million dollar question. Would gun legislation have helped stop this tragedy from happening? Highly unlikely. Why? Because criminals don’t care about the laws. That guy with all his planning would have found a way to get the weapons and all the ammunition anyway, gun laws or not. Even if he didn’t plan, he would have found a way because, he needed the guns.

The left’s thinking of banning side arms/rifles/etc. just doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t lower or eradicate all gun violence. In all reality, it still happens. Just recently on September 16th 2007, a teenager killed someone with a sidearm in Waikiki… He wounded two others. Strict laws doesn’t help anything. What America needs is responsible people, with the correct education.

Advertisements

A 232 year history of our fight against Islam

Just Say No To ISIS

Just Say No To ISIS!


 232 Year History of our fight against Islam & why it is no longer taught in our public schools…

When Thomas Jefferson saw there was no negotiating with Muslims, he formed what is now the Marines (sea going soldiers). These Marines were attached to U. S. Merchant vessels. When the Muslims attacked U.S. merchant vessels they were repulsed by armed soldiers, but there is more.
The Marines followed the Muslims back to their villages and killed every man, woman, and child in the village.

It didn’t take long for the Muslims to leave U.S. Merchant vessels alone.

English and French merchant vessels started running up our flag when entering the Mediterranean to secure safe travel.

Why the Marine Hymn contains the verse, “To the Shores of Tripoli “.

This is very interesting and a must read piece of our history. It points out where we may be heading.

Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge!

At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the “Barbary Pirates”) were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic .

They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their governments and families to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.

These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis , Morocco , and Algiers – collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast – and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic .

Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain . When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France.

However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.

Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, 17 years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America’s Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.

In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments.

Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.

In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages.

The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming.

That changed everything.

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States.

Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.

Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.

He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to “cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify”.

When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli.

The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line “to the shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as “leathernecks” for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.

Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.

America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen.

A religion based on supremacy, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him.

His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States .

This should concern every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times in America at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on..

It’s death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists’ agenda.

Sadly, it appears that today America’s leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!

IF YOU DO NOT REMEMBER THE PAST, YOU ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT.